in Entertainment

“I relate so much”- Doris Ogala calls for prayers for May Edochie

“I relate so much”- Doris Ogala calls for prayers for May Edochie

Nollywood actress, Doris Ogala has called for prayers on May Edochie as she reacts to Yul Edochie and Judy Austin’s worship session.

Earlier today Yul Edochie had shared a video of himself and his second wife, Judy Austin in praise and worship session.

Taking to his Facebook page, the son of Pete Edochie encouraged his fans and followers to start their day with God.

Sharing a video of himself and his wife praising God, he encouraged his fans to follow in their footsteps.

According to him, doing this would bring overflowing blessings.

“Start your day like this and blessings will overflow in your life. Yul Edochie, Judy Austin”.

READ ALSO:  “I will frame this and hang it in my room” BBNaija’s Mercy Eke leaps for joy as Cardi B compliments her AMVCA dress

Reacting to it, Doris Ogala took to her Instagram page to call for prayers on May Edochie.

Doris Ogala noted how she was in a similar situation but was able to move on.

“Jesus na idi mma… Heyyy @ this point. Join me in prayer by 9 p.m. Let’s ask God to tell May to move on!

I relate so much cos I was in the same situation and I moved on.

Onye Omere Amarala.

Kai God elee ebe ino… Ahhh May I relate to you so much… Onye Omere Amarala. Obi Agbawalam”.

Doris OgalaMay Yul-Edochie

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

‘Cheating Is Not My Deal Breaker’ – Yeni Kuti Reveals Why She ‘ll Dump Husband

‘Cheating Is Not My Deal Breaker’ – Yeni Kuti Reveals Why She ‘ll Dump Husband
Supreme Court throws out PDP’s suit against Shettima On Friday, the Supreme Court dismissed the lawsuit filed by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) seeking to disqualify the president-elect, Bola Tinubu, and the vice-president-elect, Kashim Shettima, from the 2023 presidential election. The apex court affirmed the eligibility of the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidates for the presidential race held on February 25. PDP’s Lawsuit Against Shettima The PDP had appealed the decision in case number SC/CV/501/2023, claiming that Tinubu should be disqualified due to Shettima’s dual nomination for both the Borno Central Senatorial seat and the Vice Presidential position. According to the PDP, this double nomination violated several sections of the Electoral Act of 2022, as amended, including Sections 29(1), 33, 35, and 84(1) and (2). The PDP requested the court to invalidate Tinubu and Shettima’s candidacies and also asked for an order compelling the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to remove their names from the list of nominated or sponsored candidates eligible to participate in the presidential election. Opposing the plaintiff’s argument, Lateef Fagbemi, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), contended that the PDP should have remained a bystander regardless of its grievances regarding how the APC nominated its candidates. “It is abundantly clear that the Appellant in the totality of its position in the instant case, is peeping and poke-nosing into the affairs of another party as a busybody and meddlesome interloper,” he said. Supreme Court’s Verdict In a unanimous decision made by a panel of five judges, the court declared that the appeal brought by the PDP to challenge the validity of the Tinubu/Shettima ticket had no merit. Justice Adamu Jauro delivered the lead judgment, upholding the previous rulings of the Court of Appeal and the Federal High Court in Abuja, which had both dismissed the case. The court stated that the plaintiff did not have the legal right to interfere in the internal affairs of the APC, which had nominated Tinubu and Shettima as its candidates for the election, and thus dismissed the appeal. The court described the appeal as an intrusive and interfering action by a meddlesome outsider, emphasizing that the law does not allow a political party to meddle in the internal affairs of another party. The court agreed with the respondents’ argument that section 285 (14) (c) of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, and section 149 of the Electoral Act of 2022 did not give them the legal right to question Shettima’s candidature based on double nomination. The apex court held that section 84 of the Electoral Act only granted the right to challenge a party’s nomination to an aspirant who had participated in the party’s primary election. Furthermore, the court maintained that the PDP failed to prove that its rights were threatened and could not establish the harm it suffered as a result of the APC’s nomination. Moreover, the apex court criticized the PDP for filing a frivolous appeal. The court affirmed that the evidence presented indicated that Shettima had properly withdrawn as the APC candidate in the Borno senatorial election on July 6, 2022. Justice Jaurosaid, “From the trial court, down to this court, it has been a waste of precious judicial time.” He admonished counsel to advise their clients “against filing this sort of suit in future.” It further awarded in favour of the respondents, the sum of N2 Million damages against the PDP.

Supreme Court throws out PDP’s suit against Shettima