in Viral Gist

Pastor ridiculed as prophecy about Tinubu, Supreme Court ruling fail [Video]

Pastor ridiculed as prophecy about Tinubu, Supreme Court ruling fail (Video)

A yet-to-be-identified pastor faces backlash as his prophecy about the president-elect, Bola Tinubu failed to come to pass.

The preacher had prophesied that the Supreme Court would rule in the favour of the opposition parties, PDP and Labour Party on May 26.

In his words, “On May 26, the Lord to me specifically that court is going to make a statement that will favour Labour Party and PDP. The statement is going to make the inauguration to become ceremonial. Those that hate rigging will rejoice.”

Unfortunately, the prophecy turned out to be a fake as the Supreme Court on Friday dismissed the suit by the Peoples Democratic Party seeking the disqualification of the ticket that produced the president-elect, Bola Tinubu and the vice-president-elect, Kashim Shettima in the 2023 presidential election.

READ ALSO:  First class student dies in car accident weeks after burying father

Zayxon_tech wrote: “So many prophecies about this election were not true, so why would we believe your own? You pastors in this country are just scammers”

Itisugochukwu penned: “I don’t understand how lord is telling different pastors different things ???????????? God sef don weak for Naija matter ????”

Joepearl1 noted: “We as Nigerians don’t even need a prophet to tell us that ????????‍♀️????????‍♀️????????‍♀️????????‍♀️”

Abolade_ogedengbe_m noted: “Leeeemao ????. Pastor na gbaladun imamu na barawo ????”

PastorTinubu

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Supreme Court throws out PDP’s suit against Shettima On Friday, the Supreme Court dismissed the lawsuit filed by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) seeking to disqualify the president-elect, Bola Tinubu, and the vice-president-elect, Kashim Shettima, from the 2023 presidential election. The apex court affirmed the eligibility of the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidates for the presidential race held on February 25. PDP’s Lawsuit Against Shettima The PDP had appealed the decision in case number SC/CV/501/2023, claiming that Tinubu should be disqualified due to Shettima’s dual nomination for both the Borno Central Senatorial seat and the Vice Presidential position. According to the PDP, this double nomination violated several sections of the Electoral Act of 2022, as amended, including Sections 29(1), 33, 35, and 84(1) and (2). The PDP requested the court to invalidate Tinubu and Shettima’s candidacies and also asked for an order compelling the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to remove their names from the list of nominated or sponsored candidates eligible to participate in the presidential election. Opposing the plaintiff’s argument, Lateef Fagbemi, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), contended that the PDP should have remained a bystander regardless of its grievances regarding how the APC nominated its candidates. “It is abundantly clear that the Appellant in the totality of its position in the instant case, is peeping and poke-nosing into the affairs of another party as a busybody and meddlesome interloper,” he said. Supreme Court’s Verdict In a unanimous decision made by a panel of five judges, the court declared that the appeal brought by the PDP to challenge the validity of the Tinubu/Shettima ticket had no merit. Justice Adamu Jauro delivered the lead judgment, upholding the previous rulings of the Court of Appeal and the Federal High Court in Abuja, which had both dismissed the case. The court stated that the plaintiff did not have the legal right to interfere in the internal affairs of the APC, which had nominated Tinubu and Shettima as its candidates for the election, and thus dismissed the appeal. The court described the appeal as an intrusive and interfering action by a meddlesome outsider, emphasizing that the law does not allow a political party to meddle in the internal affairs of another party. The court agreed with the respondents’ argument that section 285 (14) (c) of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, and section 149 of the Electoral Act of 2022 did not give them the legal right to question Shettima’s candidature based on double nomination. The apex court held that section 84 of the Electoral Act only granted the right to challenge a party’s nomination to an aspirant who had participated in the party’s primary election. Furthermore, the court maintained that the PDP failed to prove that its rights were threatened and could not establish the harm it suffered as a result of the APC’s nomination. Moreover, the apex court criticized the PDP for filing a frivolous appeal. The court affirmed that the evidence presented indicated that Shettima had properly withdrawn as the APC candidate in the Borno senatorial election on July 6, 2022. Justice Jaurosaid, “From the trial court, down to this court, it has been a waste of precious judicial time.” He admonished counsel to advise their clients “against filing this sort of suit in future.” It further awarded in favour of the respondents, the sum of N2 Million damages against the PDP.

Supreme Court throws out PDP’s suit against Shettima
Mallam Adamu Adamu has said that when President Muhammadu Buhari appointed him

I Don’t Know Anything About Education Sector When Buhari Appointed Me – Adamu